DO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HERE

NATURE WORLDWIDE: NATIONAL PARKS & NATURE RESERVES

WORLD INSTITUTE FOR CONSERVATION & ENVIRONMENT, WICE

Home Up HN NP study 2 HN NP study 3 HN NP study 4 HN NP study 5

DO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HEREDO NOT CLICK HERE

  AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 Add to Google
Don't Click Here!

Visit our favorite jungle

SITE MAP

METHODOLOGY

BLOG

WORLD LINKS

FORUM

DOCUMENTATION

FREE SOFTWARE !

WORLD REGIONS

NORTH AMERICA

CENTRAL AMERICA

SOUTH AMERICA

EUROPE

WEST AFRICA

EAST AFRICA

WESTERN ASIA

SOUTH-EAST ASIA

NORTHERN ASIA

ISLANDS & POLES

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

NATIONAL PARKS
MONITORING NATURE
WATER MANAGEMENT
GIS 4 BIOLOGISTS
ILWIS
ECOTOURISM

ECOSYSTEMS

ANIMAL ECOLOGY
VEGETATION ECOLOGY
CORAL REEFS

BIODIVERSITY

BIRDS

MAMMALS

 
WICE

 

 


1.             REVISION OF CATEGORIES

Following management concepts developed in the nineteen seventies, Honduras has assumed about eighteen management categories for SINAPH. In agreement with the Terms of Reference, part of the rationalisation process is to re-assess which categories should be used for the now existing protected areas. 

 

The existing categories are not always clear in their objectives and limitations, which is a major draw-back in setting the rules for all actors. Legal clarity is quintessential for all actors:

Citizens should know their legal rights and restrictions;
Management staff should be able to clearly understand the rules and clarify them to the stakeholders;
Law-enforcement officials (including park rangers) should know which rules to apply;
Judges must have clarity in order to be able to administer justice.

It should be well understood that protected areas are distinguished from unprotected (rural) areas by the fact that they are protected from certain human activities or uses.  That implies that there are certain sets of regulations set by law that restrict certain rights of land-use as compared to non-protected areas.  For each management category it should be made very clear what is allowed and which are the essential restrictions; differences between management categories must leave no room for doubt. With 18 different categories, there is no clarity and we propose that the number of management categories of SINAPH be reduced to the categories listed in Table 7, “Characteristics and use objectives of categories of management areas as proposed in this study” and that their definitions as proposed in the following paragraphs be included both in the law and elaborated in a new Code of Regulation for SINAPH

 


Table 9 : Characteristics and use objectives of categories of management areas as proposed by this study.

Characteristics and objectives

National Park

Nature Reserve

National Monument

Multiple Use Area

National Forest

IUCN Category[1]

II

Ia and Ib

III

V or VI

VI

Size

More than 5000 ha

Any size

Less than 5000

Any size

Any size

Importance

National or International

National or International

National

Local

National

Integrity of a representative example of an ecosystem

Yes

Yes

Facultative

Facultative in designated areas1

Facultative in designated areas1

Unique landscapes or geological formations

Yes

Facultative

Yes

Facultative in designated areas1

Facultative in designated areas1

Research

Yes

Yes

Facultative

Facultative

Facultative

Environmental Education

Yes

Facultative

Yes

Facultative

Facultative

Visitation and Recreation

Yes

Facultative

Yes

Yes

Yes

Production of water

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Production of wood and non-wood products

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Hunting

In designated parts of the bufferzones only1

In designated parts of the bufferzones only1

In designated parts of the bufferzones only1

Yes

Yes

Habitation

In designated areas in bufferzones1

In designated areas in bufferzones1

In designated areas in bufferzones1

In designated areas only1

In designated areas only1

1 as defined and regulated in the management plan.



The advisory team has taken the six world wide IUCN management categories as the point of departure for defining the proposed categories, as those categories basically cover all the different existing options into clear and distinct sets of rules. Specific legal definitions are proposed for each Honduran category. The precise legal clarity, the wording has been kept exactly the same for all categories where the conditions coincide. Differences are made clear by textual differentiation or absence.

 

A National park is a large – usually over 5000 ha - natural terrestrial or aquatic area of national importance to protect the integrity of a representative sample of one or more ecosystems with their ecological processes and genetic flow, groups of species, unique natural phenomena and to conserve outstanding landscapes and/or natural beauty in an unaltered state. A management plan is subject to approval by the management authority, after a stakeholder hearing process. It defines the nuclear and bufferzone(s) and other zoning, including, for the nuclear zone the visitation areas, and for the bufferzone(s) land-use, areas for habitation and biodiversity conservation, as well as land use regulation and wildlife management to protect biodiversity in the bufferzones. In the nuclear zone(s) non-consumptive use is permitted – if compatible with natural ecological processes and subject to regulation in the management plan - specifically, scientific research, environmental education, visitation and harvesting of water; forbidden are any human productive or extractive land use. In the bufferzones hunting is forbidden, unless by ethnic groups with traditional land-uses, in which case the hunting regimen shall be defined in the management plan.

 

A Nature Reserve is a natural terrestrial or aquatic area of national importance to protect the integrity of a representative sample of one or more ecosystems with their ecological processes and genetic flow, groups of species, unique natural phenomena and to conserve outstanding landscapes and/or natural beauty in an unaltered state. A management plan is subject to approval by the management authority, after a stakeholder hearing process. It defines the nuclear and bufferzone(s) and other zoning, including for the bufferzone(s) land-use, areas for habitation and biodiversity conservation, as well as land use regulation and wildlife management to protect biodiversity in the bufferzones. In the nuclear zone(s) non-consumptive use is permitted – if compatible with natural ecological processes and subject to regulation in the management plan - specifically, scientific research, environmental education, and harvesting of water; forbidden are any human productive or extractive land use. In the bufferzones hunting is forbidden, unless by ethnic groups with traditional land-uses, in which case the hunting regimen shall be defined in the management plan.

 

A Natural Monument is a natural terrestrial or aquatic area – usually less than 5000 ha - of national importance to protect the integrity of a representative sample of one or more ecosystems with their ecological processes and genetic flow, groups of species, unique natural phenomena or to conserve outstanding landscapes and/or natural beauty in an unaltered state. A management plan is subject to approval by the management authority, after a stakeholder hearing process. It defines zoning, including the visitation areas. Non-consumptive use is permitted – if compatible with natural ecological processes and subject to regulation in the management plan - specifically, scientific research, environmental education, visitation and harvesting of water; forbidden are any human productive or extractive land uses.

 

Assuming these definitions, the areas of the “National Parks system” model have been selected as an integrated group of areas that together is expected to conserve the majority of biodiversity of Honduras through ecosystem protection. Each one has ecosystems whose integrity is essential for the conservation of the national heritage of Honduras’ biodiversity.

 

The advisory group recommends that several protected areas be combined into one single protected area:

·         National Park Pico Bonito would be unified with Texiguat and Arenal; 

·         Golfo de Fonseca National Park would result from the merger of the estuarine protected areas on the south coast;

·         Bay Islands National Park already consists of the three larger Bay Islands;

·         Rus Rus National Park would include Warunta in the proposal;

·         Lago de Yojoa would encompass Santa Barbara and Mount Azul Meambar;  

·         Capiro y Calenturo would be expanded with Laguna Guaymoreto.

The unification of these areas would upgrade the splendour of each unit, it would simplify the administration and it would enhance the public recognition of these high-profile national parks.  After the merging of these areas, Honduras would have 24 national parks, 4 biological reserves and 2 natural monuments. Whether this can be done legally or only from a management point of view may vary from case to case, but it is important to at least present those areas to the public as integrated national park units. This would also need to be reflected in fully integrated management plans. This should be considered as the regional plans as proposed in the draft strategy for SINAPH.

 

Unification would also lead to reduced management costs, as some of the management functions could be reduced, resulting from the lower management costs for larger protected areas.

 

Protected areas in Honduras, usually include bufferzones. These bufferzones allow for certain forms of utilisation of natural resources, and therefore would fall under IUCN Category VI. On the other hand, Category II and VI areas may contain within them Category I areas. The nature reserve should have the option to define Ia or Ib status by management plan, rather than defining such status by decree. This will allow the area administration the necessary flexibility to properly protect the area.  Usually a dual function is ideal and such distinction would most appropriately be established in internal zoning regulations as established in the management plan.

 

The nature reserve part of the Lancetilla Botanical Garden would best qualify under the management category of biological reserve.  However, both the botanical garden and its international research programme generate considerable visitation. Visitation is not a primary characteristic for a nature reserve and therefore the JBL - with its reserve as a lower visitation zone - would probably better fit under the category of national monument as defined previously in this document.  Specific needs of the area would need to be regulated in the management plan.

 

An observation regarding the integrity of the Bay Islands Marine National Park is at place.  While the significance of the area’s marine environment is and remains paramount, there should be more integration of both marine and the unique Caribbean terrestrial ecosystems into the management attention as well as in the presentation to the visitors.



Table 10 : Selected Areas and Proposed Management Category

Main Protected Area

Supporting Protected Area

Current legislature

Current Category

Proposed Status

Regional office

Botaderos

 

Proposed

 

Parque Nacional Botaderos

 

Capiro y Calentura

Guaymoreto

Ac. 1118-92

National Park

Parque Nacional Capiro y Calentura

La Ceiba

Caratasca

 

Proposed

 

Parque Nacional La Mosquitia

Puerto Lempira

Rus Rus

 

Proposed

 

 

Puerto Lempira

Warunta

 

Proposed

 

 

Puerto Lempira

Rio Kruta

 

Proposed

 

 

Puerto Lempira

Cayos Cochinos

 

Proposed

Marine Reserve

Reserva Biológica Marina

La Ceiba

Celaque

 

Decr. 87-87

National Park

Parque Nacional Celaque

 

Cuero y Salado

 

Decr. 99-87

Wildlife Reserve

Parque Nacional Cuero y Salado

La Ceiba

Cuevas de Taulabe

 

Ac. 1118-92

Natural Monument

Monumento Natural Cuevas de Taulabe

 

Cusuco

 

Decr. 87-87

National Park

Parque Nacional Cusuco

San Pedro

El Boqueron

 

Proposed

 

Monumento Natural Boqueron

HQ

El Chile

 

Decr. 87-87

Biological Reserve

Parque Nacional El Chile

HQ

Golfo de Fonseca

 

5-99-E

Mixted categories

Parque Nacional Golfo de Fonseca

Choluteca

 

La Barberia

Decr. 5-99-E

Mixted categories

 

 

 

El Jicarito

Decr. 5-99-E

Mixted categories

 

 

 

Los Delgaditos

Decr. 5-99-E

Mixted categories

 

 

 

Bahia Chismuyo

Decr. 5-99-E

Mixted categories

 

 

 

San Lorenzo

Decr. 5-99-E

Mixted categories

 

 

 

Las Iguanas-Punta Condega

Decr. 5-99-E

Mixted categories

 

 

 

Isla de la Tigra

Decr. 5-99-E

Mixted categories

 

 

 

San Bernado